Misandry

 I had a quite striking realization recently.  Most if not all of the best men in America are failures in the worldly sense.  In a sane and honorable world, men like James Lafond, Xah Lee, Karl Denninger, and Dissident Sound would be successful.  Well, KD was successful, but he went into rustication because of how screwed up American society is.  That doesn't bode well either.  The truth is that success is a lie in America, and most of the "successful" are living unbalanced, unsustainable, desperate lives up to their eyeballs in debt and of a quality not much above slaves.

America is a misandrist society designed to inhibit and destroy the best men, and it does so well.  This is why I have always detested it and I don't care if it fails, in fact I would welcome it.  I know of two married couples who are upper middle class aspiring (without the possibility of really getting there).  The two women in question are the sister of a friend of mine, and the wife of this same friend.  They have always been awfully judgy toward me, and this has gotten to be more so over time as they imagine they are ascending the status ladder.  The former wanted to date me at one point, though.

Now you might think this would be because of worldly success, and that's what I thought for a long time, but I realized all of a sudden that's not it at all.  It's because America is a gynocratic tyranny and it detests men, especially ones not easily domesticated.  Though these women claim to be conservatives, they are really just conservative of America's gynocratic, misandrist society.  Any man who is a little too "wild", a little too "solitary", a little too "willful" is viewed with suspicion.  The bottom line is that the kind of men women want to marry are servile.  Worldly success is a lesser consideration.  This goes against what certain writers like Aaron Clarey would tell you about women and what they want, but it happens to be true.

I like the men in this case but they are unfortunate because what they are doing right now is going through an extended childhood of being supported by women, only instead of being mama's boys, they are now house husbands.  This is a very common arrangement in America and an awful lot of people are in denial about it as well, because they deep down know it is not dignified.  That's right -- neither of these men would be able to live a middle class life on their own.  And I don't blame them for that, because obviously this economy is a scam and a lie and there is not enough good work to go around, or this would not be such a common story.

To give another example of the same thing, there is another guy I know of who is far more successful in the worldly sense than these two men.  In terms of his career, the chasing of an ideal, and monetary success, he is above them.  But he doesn't even have a girlfriend, much less a wife.  And he had to leave this area because a lot of people in the community hated him.  Why?  Because he had a quarrel with a woman and everyone took her side against him, even though she was a known drama queen (although of course he did bear some of the blame).  And look at how many successful men in society, even if I don't care for them, like Elon Musk or Donald Trump, come to be despised rather than praised, while obvious fruits and diversity hires like Barack Obama are praised and nearly worshipped.

Some will say this is "anecdotal".  But it isn't at all.  If you actually had the honesty to look around you in your local area, you'd find countless similar examples.  I've heard it all over the place.  Add up enough of these anecdotes over enough years and you have a pretty good data set.  And of course the quant types never think this way, and they always believe the tainted data sets they get from official sources -- NPCs.  America has a misandry problem, a profound one, and it reaches into every home and family.  That's why it's disingenuous to blame any one group for this, even if it is exploited by the powers that be.  It is a very widespread problem that almost everyone acquiesces to the perpetuation of while vehemently denying that's what they are doing.