Aryan Histories

The Temple as Yantra:

All temples are constructed to geometry and symmetry. When the Druid temple worship entered the Vedas in the Athava Veda period after the Great Civil War at Kurukshetra, Temples evolved from a place of worship into a "Yantra" or tool for spiritual upliftment. They thus became an integration of a very large number of empowering attributes comprising an entire ladder. Here is something I had written a long time ago: " After the Mahabharatha War. Aryan law under went drastic change. The Shudras were included in the Guru Kula Varna system. The tributary Druids of Mesopotamian origin and the Aryan over lords of Eurasian origin began to inter marry. The Atharvaveda Period began and the Temple worship of the Mesopotamian origin Shaivism, Vaishnavism, and Shakthaism entered the Vedas together with agriculture and architecture through the Aagama (that which came from outside) Shastras. At this time the Druid Temples were integrated as Yantras into the Aryan system. The Aryan law born on the steppes that stretched from East Prussia to Mongolia to serve the warlike, pastoral nomads proscribed the ownership of Mother Earth (Bhu Shree) by men and so it was that in the integrative process, land was vested in the temples and the Aryan Kings, who had now to rule even more by consent after their hegemony and power had been broken by the great Civil War, deferred to the Patron Gods rather than the remote Brahma and his officers (Dasha Dikpalakas) of Nature and who (Nava Grahas) enforced Karma and Dharma.

The temples emerged as the refuge of last resort and under the modified Bharatha Varsha (laws of Bharatha originating in the Treaty of Bharatha) a fifth of the produce went to the cultivator, a fifth for public works such as irrigation, roads and so on, a fifth for running the guru kulas and dharmashalas for the care of widows, orphans, pilgrims and others, a fifth for the maintenance of law and order, security and the justice system and the final fifth to the temple to be drawn for the welfare of the contributing congregation in times of emergency and need whether war, famine, disease or natural calamity. Siva Temples dispensed free education and shelter. Vishnu Temples dispensed free entertainment and refreshments while maintaining the treasury. Shaktha Temples dispensed free health care and food. The temple as a Yantra was now endowed and imbued with power both by the Aryan tradition (Havans and Yajnas) as well as the Druid tradition (Aagamas).

While the Druid worship was performed in the Sanctum, the Aryan worship was dispensed in Vedic style on the Brahma Peetha constructed for the purpose in front of the Sanctum while Justice was dispensed on a Mantapa constructed for the purpose in the North East or South by the Shastri before whom, depending on the stature of the temple, appeals were brought against decisions of the Panchayath or the King's Court. Mythology (Puranas) proliferated and were used by the Shaivas, Vasihnavas and Shaakthas to subtly claim superiority over each other while bringing about integration (for example Shiva was defeated abjectly by Vishnu in Vaishnavite traditions and it is his bow that Rama encounters in the Seeta Syamvara, Vishnu is constantly praying to Shiva in Shaivite tradition to save the earth from destruction, where Shiva also removes Brahma's fifth head for lying about Shiva's infinite nature, and Shakthi is constantly being invoked to come to the rescue of the others and save them from monsters of their own creation. In this process, the Aryan-Vedic Brahma, the supreme creator from whom comes his light Mitra who together with his fluid Varuna and matter Aryama form the cosmos. Mitra forms and sustains 12,000 types of Suns. From the Sun comes his light Savitur (father) comprising the three Gunas of Virinchi (creative etc), Narayana (sustaining etc) and Shankara (transcreative etc), who, as light, warmth etc (Sandhya), life etc (Savitri), sound etc (Gayatri) and knowledge "

It has been the Indian view from times immemorial that the arts convey a spiritual message.

The original Aryan view is that the Sun is the living idol of Brahman and all nature is his temple where every deity and spirit is a manifestation of Brahman. Where every entity (or body) is a complete Bheeja (seed or fractal) replicated by and, in turn, mimicking Brahman. The austere Rig Veda (10,000 years ago?) of the Central Asian plains was infused with the joy of the Aryan discovery of India, a land overflowing with milk and honey, to birth the Yajur Veda (8,000 years ago?). The itinerant Aryans, reaping the fruit of Dravidian agriculture, architecture and civilization, settled and progressed to the stylized music of the Sama Veda (6,000 years ago?). With the integration of the technologies and philosophies of Dravidian civilization (such as Agriculture, Architecture, Irrigation and so on) into the Aryan culture (Chivalry, Law, Astronomy, Military Science, Animal Husbandry and others) was born the Atharva Veda (4,000 years ago?), incorporating the Agama (that which came from outside) Shastras (rules) that dwell, among other things, on temple architecture. This, then, is the genesis of Indo-Aryan architecture.

The earliest surviving temples, that have weathered the destructiveness of Ashokan Tyranny and Islamic invaders, are all designed as material mimicry of the Spiritual realms. Hewn out of rock by Chalukya and Pallava Kings in the Deep South of India and comparatively safe from Moslems, these are all allegorical puzzles intended to evoke spiritual realization. In an inscription by Mahendravarman Pallava (around 1,500 years ago?) we are clearly told that the exquisite cave temple (at Mahabalipuram) was built “without bricks, without mortar, without wood and without metal” (etad anishtakam adrumam, aloham asudham – Sanskrit. i.e. Indo-Aryan, not Dravidian). The hidden allusion in this passage becomes clear when viewed in the context of the Rig Veda, where, the heart is a cave (guha), hewn in the rock of the body, in which dwells the eternal spirit (guhasaya gahvareshtah puranah). A vedic text describes the citadel of the Deva s (Brahman’s officers), as having eight nodes (Chakra s) and nine doorways and as enveloping a golden core of light, (Chintamani lit. Gem of consciousness), where divine beings actually dwell. Tantra texts explain how there are openings in the human body, and Chakras are key point nodes (Loka s : spheres of positive existence; also Laya or melody) juxtaposed with antinodes (Tala s : spheres of negative existence or rhythm - hells) where the divine-spiritual will manifests in the human body through key points in the nervous system. The seven major ones are stacked vertically from a point near the coccyx to a point just above the head and represent ascending planes of consciousness, perception and truth. These are dynamos of sensory and motor energy. Note: Tantra means “methodology” (of which there are sixty-four distinct traditional disciplines, ranging from Asceticism to Hedonism. Brahmins, traditionally follow Samayachara Tantra – balance and moderation). Mantra is the vibration of manifest consciousness (meaningful sound). Yantra is a tool, machine, puzzle, symbol or temple. The three (Tantra, Mantra and Yantra) form the ingredients of human ritual, culture and civilization.

The congruence between a temple of stone and a temple of flesh and a temple of spirit is carried much further when we proceed from the cave temples to the structural ones of later times. In these, the “King of the Dark Chamber” is conceived as enthroned in lofty majesty (South India), or encircled by a divine aura or halo of light (North India). While the Devalaya (Temple) is regarded as the house of eternity or the abode of the immortal everywhere, in the North the emphasis is on the Aryan conception of Brahma (or Budha) as omniscience or consciousness. The South Indian temple is skewed, in Dravidian parlance, to be the abode of the King of the Universe (Ko-il). Emphasising this conception is the choice of rock as the material for construction and a tower, particularly should a hill or promontory be unavailable to site. The imperishable material of stone was suggestive of eternity while the promontory uplifted the focus. On the plains, a tower sought the same latter effect. Generally, in the North, towers received emphasis over the sanctum while the South moved from this position (as in the Brihadeeswara (Lord of the Universe) Temple at Tanjore) to raise the more imposing towers over the entrance (Meenakshi Temple of Madurai or Sriranganatha (Lord of the glorious theatre) Temple near Trichinopoly). The form of ritual worship is often in the form of stylized court (durbar) procedure where the Deity is referred to as Emperor (Sarvabhauma) and obligatory royal greetings, tributes, ceremonies and services (Rajopachara) are performed stressing that the deity is a representation of the “King of the Universe”.

As regards the form of a temple, one is struck, at first, with the flagstaff (dhwajasthamba) right in front. Dhwaja (flag) represents the creative principle in the human body, and the festive season when the flag is hoisted corresponds to Spring when flowers blossom and nature unfurls Her flag. The courtyard of a temple may be compared to the lungs. Past this is the heart of the temple called the Garbhagruha – the house of creation / origin. This word is a silent witness of the original form of the temple, which consisted of a rock cut cave with one or more chambers.
The spire (Vimana-Lit. Sky, Fig. Roof) over the Garbhagruha might be of seven, nine, eleven, or twelve stories. In the exquisite, and perfect temples built by the Hoysala Kings, we find three, five or seven rows of friezes on the railed parapet. In Srirangam we find seven walled enclosures. The number of porches and niches (mantapa s) is 108 or 1001. The significance of number is apparent not only in present day India, but also in Greater India. The grotto of the 1000 Budhas in Serindia, for example. In Borobudur (Java) we have an enclosing wall, five polygonal and three circular galleries connected by a staircase, and 504 figures in niches and cupolas. It is noteworthy too that the number of figures in the niches is 108 to each side on the decorated platforms.

Since ancient Rig Vedic times, the Aryan novitiate repeats sacred mantras in sets of 108 till it becomes an integrated inner vibration that can be evoked at will. The symbolism of number is explained in various passages of the Yajurveda and in the Tantra texts. Three denotes the attributes of matter and spirit ; the proclivities (guna s) of Rajasa (Activity, extremism and materialism), Tamasa (Inertia and negativism) and Satvica (Truth, moderation and positivism); the aspects of Brahman (Shankara :destructive, Narayana, preservative and Virinchi: Creative) and their Shakthis (manifestations/energies of Parvathi :power, Lakshmi: prosperity and Saraswathi: wisdom) etc. Seven refers to the orifices in the head, the structure of creation (loka and tala) and the spiritual or subtle (sukshma) layers of manifest reality (sthula). Eleven indicates the mind, the sense organs, and the senses. Twelve refers to the power of light. The Vimana, thus, traditionally represents the head over the region of the heart (garbhagruha). There is a detail, more prevalent in the South, significantly called the neck (kantha) between the two spaces. The terms used by traditional architects, sculptors and masons (sthapathis) are full of allusions to the human body.
Fa-hien, the medieval Chinese explorer who chronicled his journeys through India (Beal: Budhist Records. Vol.I, pp 68-69) describes a since destroyed rock cut monastery of the Deccan as having five stages.

The lowest is made with elephant figures and has 500 cells in it. The second is made with lion figures and has 400 chambers. The third is made with horses and has 300 chambers. The fourth is made with ox shapes and has 200 chambers. The fifth has dome shapes and has 100 chambers in it.

It is not coincidence that the same animals are echoed in the Sanchi sculptures; which reappear, much later in Ashoka’s handiwork and play a prominent part in Budhist birth stories and iconography. One conjecture is that these animals symbolize the four quarters. But Rampurva is content with just two (the bull and the Lion – History of fine art, p.60). We have more than four animals in the remains of the Moslem depredations of the exquisite sculptures of the Hoysala Kingdom and Vijayanagar Empire, neither of which was Budhist, being driven by Aryan principles towards the emerging kaleidoscope of “Hinduism”, and were later than Ashoka. The symbolism of animals is apparent not only in the art of the ancient Indo-Aryans (Harappa and Mohenjo Daro – 8,000 years ago?) but throughout India and Greater India (Ceylon, South East Asia). The animals appear in the same order in almost all cases, cultures, kingdoms, empires, over a vast expanse of time.

One plausible theory (Prof. S.V. Venkateshwara) is that this is a crystallization of the suggestive animal analogies and symbolism from the Upanishads (teachings) of the Rig Vedic period. Horses symbolize the senses (Indriyam Hayanahuh) and the chariot the mind, according to the Katha Upanishad. Later Vedic literature has the mind compared to the Bull, which would either rest (tamasa) or run astray (rajasa), and so has to be driven along the steep road of truth (Satvika Marga) to human perfection (ramyo balivardhah). Puranic (Allegorical traditional History) and Tantric cosmology elaborate the symbolism to a further extent. In the Markandeya Purana, Durga as Pranashakthi (life force), is described as riding a lion (Simha-Vahini). In Puranic and Tantric cosmology, the spiritual forces supporting the materially manifested Universe and the planet are named and represented as Elephants. The spiritual-subtle (sukshma) sheaths (auras) of the gross body (sthula shareera) are in exactly the same order in philosophy as in sculpture. The material body (elephant), the life force (lion), the senses (horses), the mind (ox), and spiritual knowledge (dome: Vimana – lit. Sky, fig. Roof). The crocodile (Makara of Hoysala for example, Vahana of Varuna) that appears and disappears from period to period and from dynasty to dynasty may be suggestive of Nescience (Moha- the illusion of passion and lust) whose capture is conquest of the self, as laid down in the Panchadasi-prakarana. (Savila-samahamohagrahagrasaikakarmane : Chapter 1:1). The symbolism of other figures is explicable on similar lines. Garuda (the now extinct Indian Eagle) preying on the dragon may represent the cycle during which the immortal parts are liberated from the gross matter to which they have been wedded. i.e. liberation. The Upanishads assert that the body is the sustenance of the life force (Sarire pranah prathistithah : Taitreya Upanishad), and that the emergence of the realised self from the gross body is with the speed of the hawk (Syeno javasa niradiyamiti).

---

All this is based on the assumption that migration and settlement is invasion, and that the Aryans were posited as a race. Neither the protagonists nor the antagonists have a classical Sanskrit education or a sense of the enormous canvas of History and Geography involved. All this is political legerdemain that extrapolates a more convenient past from what seems present.

I am not a theorist. I find both the “Aryan Invasion Theory” and “Out of India Theory” Laughable as theories cherry pick politically convenient bits and pieces from conveniently reduced time and space tapestry.

Arya was never claimed to be a race. Arya mean noble and denotes those who are bound by the Brahmin law derived from the Prathamo Upaishad (Dharma and Karma) and the Aryan Consitution (represented by the Swasthika) That Arya is a "race" is a Western confection.

India is among very few hosts of the surviving islands of Aryan culture, albeit under persecution under the Indian Republic that confiscated their religious freedoms, temples and common wealth in 1959. But Aryan (Brahmin) laws and beliefs did not originate in India. Those who have not been classically educated in Sanskrit (Prathamo Upanishad, Vedas, Ithihasa etc) should not talk of "Aryans" as the British and the Nazis did or try to negate the Periyar-Ambedkar-Nehru-Gandhi-Other (Alien) Religion-Communist racist theories that are rooted in them. The difficulty for a genuine Historian who has not grown up in the Shroutha Smartha Ithihasa tradition where, like the Japanese Kojiki, History has passed from mouth to ear and has been committed to memory, has to do with the scale of Geography and time that makes a mockery of the limited vision of “Historians” who impose gew gaws like the Gregorian calendar or apply the scale of the Old Testament (the Jews were themselves apostates from the Shiva, Vishnu and Laltiha worshiping Druhyus of Mesopotamia) on an extremely vast panorama. There have been many migrations in and out of what is now called India over the ages. The inward migrations during the Shukla Yajur Veda period that heralded the Treaty and Laws of Bharatha and commenced the Krishna Yajur Veda Period was just one. Great outward migrations took place after the great Civil War of Kurukshetra when Aryan power was broken and the the Druhyus and Aryas intermarried and temple worship and Shaivism, Shaakthaism and Vaishnavism were Sanskritised and the Fourth Varna of Shudra enetered the Guru Kulas with Varna Mobility thereafter, again when Ashoka began the persecution of Brahmanism, and more recently through the Islamic slave caravans from which the Romanis escaped.

How will you have archaeological or genetic proof of a nomadic, pastoral, multi racial people? Even after they integrated with the Druhyu (Dasyus) after the Civil War of Kurukshetra, whatever temples and universities they created were destroyed by Ashoka. The only proof is the oral tradition of the Shroutha Smartha Ithihasa that is corroborated by linguistic traditions and genetics found all over the world.

What is Aryan Invasion Theory? It seems to be something that Neo-Integrationists or, "Gen Next" Jabberlal Neckscrews have drummed up as ar Redicsovery of India? I am classically educated in Sasnkrit and subscribe to Shrotuha Smartha Ithihasa. I personally think that those who have not had a classical Sanskrit education and are busy trying to remove the words Brahmin and Arya from the Indian dictionary or, to recast them in consonance with or in opposition to the Periyar-Ambedkar-Nehru-Gandhi-Imported Relgion-Communist consensus should not be tampering with the History of the Druido-Aryan civilization of the Indian Subcontinent.

All allusions to an Aryan Invasion theory are baseless because there could not have been any "invasion" when there were no "nations".. The intoxicating Soma integral to some Rik Vedic rituals is juice crushed from a creeper that grows along the highlands bordering the Aryan stamping grounds from East Prussia to Mongolia and is not available in the Indian sub continent. What does DNA prove? That there is no racial purity. Racial purity was never posited in the first place. The Shroutha Smartha Ithihasa states very clearly that after the Mahabharatha War, the Idolatrous, agricultural, temple worshipping Druids who originated in Mesopotamia and the Caucasian to Mongoloid nomadic, war like pastoral Aryas of the Eurasian steppes who had settled in the Indo-Gangetic Plain under the treaty of Bharatha, exacting tribute from the Druids, inter married after the Mahabharatha War and that the agricultural, architectural and temple worshipping methodologies entered the Vedas as the Aagama (that which came from outside) Shastras of the Atharva (the chronologically last or fifth) Veda. The Vedic Period that came to an end with Ashoka's fratricidal war and tyranny that put an end to the Treaty of Bharatha. Legends see many counter migrations out of what is now known as India. After the Mahabharatha War there was a great Exodus of Aryans from the Indo Gangetic Plain towards Europe with written Sanskrit. Sanskrit is still spoken in Lithuania but with an entirely different script and accent. After Ashoka's genocide and persecution of Brahmanism many went as far as the Urals and beyond while some, like Adi Shankara's ancestors, escaped to the deep South. Again during the Islamic invasions, many slaves were transported to the Middle East and Europe. The Romanis are descendants of those who escaped from Islamic slavers and plunderers. So, really given the time scale, the geographic scale and the many migrations inwards and outwards, what conclusive "scientific" proof is there? Precisely what does this prove or disprove? All available data fits in to the Shroutha Smartha Ithihasa and none contradicts it. THEORIES constructed out of selective or limited (in time and space) data contradict the Ithihasa. The earliest written (inscriptions) in Sanskrit are found in the remains of the Mitani Kingdom in Northern Syria (!500 - 1350 BC) in the Tigris-Euphrates Basin. Ofcourse, Sanskrit had NO written script in the nomadi,c pastoral Rik Vedic and Shukla Yajur Vedic Period when all knowledge was passed in the Shroutha (Heard) Smartha (remembered) tradition, but borrowed Devnagiri from a conquered Agricultural and Architectural civilization in the Krishna Yajur Veda Period. There is worship of theDruido-Aryan trinity in Yugoslavia since before the advent of Christianity there.

The Rik Veda evolved in the Aryan Grazing grounds between East Prussia and Mongolia. They had interactions with agricultural civilizations all around them and, therefore, cultural influence when they raided them for food during times of Kshama (scarcity) for themselves. The Druids of ancient Ur escaped their harrying as well as their own apostates who had embraced Yahweh and migrated all over. Some of them brought, agriculture, architecture etc (i.e. civilization) to the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Some Aryans followed them, conquering them during the Shukla Yajur Veda Period (invention of Archery, Chariot use in warfare). During the Krishna Yajur Veda Period, they settled under the treaty and laws of Bharatha. They exacted tribute from the Dasyus (Druids) in terms of agricultural and archtiectural produce and other forms of labour. This led to the decadence of the Sama Veda period. This led to the Mahabharatha War. This civil war broke Aryan hegemony giving rise to the Athrava Veda Period when the Dasyus and the Aryas inter married, the Shudra Varna entered the Guru Kulas and a great number of Aryas migrated back to their home lands and beyond. The Atharva Veda (Vedic period) came to an end when Ashoka destroyed the Druido-Aryan temples and dismantled the Gurukulas (thereby putting an end to Varna Mobility) in revenge for being declared an outcaste by the Supreme Council of Kashi when he contravened the treaty of Bharatha that established the consensus of Ashwamedha Yajna during the Krishna Yajur Veda period in place of the Rik Vedic Rajasooya where the heads of opposing kings are offered in the sacred fire by the victor. Ashoka waged war on his fellow Aryas (like the US waging war on NATO). At this time too a great number of Druido Aryas migrated to the North and the North West from India. Markers, there is no older structure than Saranath in Ashoka's former empire. The back lash to Ashoka's tyranny destroyed Budhism is India together withn the Ashoka Chakra with which Ashoka replaced the Swastika of Aryavartha Dharma whereas, Budhism prospers in South East Asia and Japan with the Swastika emblazoned on Budhist temples. Adi Shankara whose ancestors fled deep South to escape Ashokan persecution revived Sanskrit and the Brahma Sutras. .

“India is a complete mix of Asian and European genetic components. The Caucasus hunter-gatherer ancestry is the best match we’ve found for the European genetic component found right across modern Indian populations,” - http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/...

DNA studies of Indian ancestry corroborates Shroutha Smartha Ithihasa.

Please note that I am not a politician and it is irrelevant to me as to what others believe. I am sharing information that I have as somebody educated in classical Sanskrit and Ithihasa for those who want to learn.

---

Congratulations on disproving what was never posited in the first place.

You have, obviously, never had a classical Sanskrit education and are a product of the political distortions that you now defend. To wit:

Outside of the "Church", we, the Illuminati, have always known that Paul embraced the temptations of Satan repudiated by Jesus and turned Christianity into an Empire. Constantine Charlemagne James and others formed Councils that cherry picked gospels suitable for the purpose and discarded the rest. This is why present day Christians cannot perform the miracles that Jesus' original disciples could despite claiming to be following in Jesus' footsteps. We also know that Christianity not only failed Jesus, but also failed Satan as it got corrupted by various human virtues such as mercy, compassion, and love. This is why Satan set Christianity aside, possessed Mahomet and founded Islam:

Ashoka did the same thing and twisted Budhism (which was a proselytizing and modified Brahmanism) to his Imperial advantage, tyranny and self glorification. The backlash all but wiped out Budhism and the Black Chakra of Ashoka's writ in India while Budhism prospered elsewhere in China, Japan, Tibet and so on under the benign Saffron Swasthika of the Aryan Constitution.

This is rather like William Hunter of the William Hunter Commission created by the British that picked up fragments of the Manu Smrithi, Vedas and so on from Max Mueller and others and twisted them and published their own perverted versions as a central pillar of their effort to create a "Hinduism" to replace the People of Dharma by eradicating Brahmanism, and the talking, walking Libraries of Aryan History, Law, Traditions and so on, The Brahmins.

Discussions and debates can be seen to quickly resolve into A-B-C classification
About 60% (c) devolves rather quickly into name calling and imputing personal qualities to those whose ideas threaten the cultivated belief systems of the participants.

About 3% (a) revolves around serious exploration, learning and inquiry involving, purely, cultured and educated persons.

The Middle Segment 37% (b) comprises discussions between linguistically accomplished persons who are bankrupt in original thinking and learning skills. This segment that comprises the bulk of politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, doctors, engineers, historians and others such as who own, operate and sell the United Nations, Universities, Governments and other such institutions, is almost entirely into semantics masquerading as ideas or debate.

---

What exactly does genetics prove? Nothing. Your imputation of racism to "Arya" is imported from your Western indoctrination. It is not part of the Shroutha Smartha Ithihasa. As you may have discovered had you read and digested my comment

Aryans were always multi racial from Caucasian to Mogoloid and incorporating the Semitic blood streams through wives kidnapped in the Shukla Yajur Veda Period. Aryans are those who follow the laws given by the Shroutha Smartha Brahmins descended from the Saptha Rishis who received the Parathamo Upanishad from Brahma. The Notions of Karma and Sharma arise from this Upanishad but have been distorted in various other religions. They are also bound by the Aryan Constitution and the laws that flow therefrom as Mantras represented by the Yantra of the Swasthika. The Brahmin religion of the Aryan Nation was always patrilineal.

What is Aryan "Invasion"? There were no geographic nations to invade at that time. There were no boundaries as the Nations comprised nomadic people who migrated freely. Believe it or not, there were also no Passports and Visas. There were also no “Hindus” then as now. The Aryans comprised two races. Causacasian and Mogolid as their grazing grounds extended from East Prussia to Mongolia. They were nomadic, pastoral, war like united by a single Constitution and advanced laws and chivalry apart from religion. They were stocky, bracycephalic, and ruddy to golden complexioned. The fair, tall, encycephalic, Shiva, Vishnu and Lalitha worshipping, idolatrous, agricultural and architectural Druids scattered from Mesopotamia in all directions when they were harried by their own apostates who had adopted the Jealous God of Abraham, Yahweh. in the Post Rik Vedic, Shukla Yajur Vedic period (20,000 Varshas ago) some of them settled in the Indo-Gangetic plains over laying the original inhabitants who were negroid. The Aryans who followed them here exacted tribute from them in the form of agriculture,architectural and other produce such as jewellery, weapons and raiment. This led to the joyous tones of the Krishna Yajur Veda (16,000 Varshas ago) followed by the Decadence of the Sama Veda (12,000 Varshas ago) . from which music originated. With the Mahabharatha War (8,000 Varshas ago) , Aryan hegemony came to an end, weakened by the Civil War. Aryans and Druids inter married.The Shudra Varna entered the Guru KUla systems and temple worship, agriculture and architecture entered the Atharva Veda through the Aagama (that which came from the outside) Shastras. The Vedic period came to an end with Ashoka (2,500 Varshas ago). As a classically educated Shroutha (Heard) Smartha (Remembered) who is exposed to Ithihasa, I cannot buy politically convenient confections that arrange cherry picked data to fit a hypothesis that neither allows for the time period, geographic expanse nor the many migrations and inter mingling involved. Counter migrations took place afte the Mahabharatha War when Aryna fled as far as modern day Lithuania. And after Ashoka when, just as Adi Shankara's ancestors had fled to th deep South to escape persecution, other had fled as far as the Urals. Others such as the Romanis are descended from those who escaped Moslem Slavers taking them back from what is now called India. Above all, "genetics" or "DNA" is not even able to establish acceptable forensic evidence beyond reasonable doubt in Criminal cases.

The Rik Veda evolved in the Aryan Grazing grounds between East Prussia and Mongolia. They had interactions with agricultural civilizations all around them and, therefore, cultural influence when they raided them for food during times of Kshama (scarcity) for themselves. The Druids of ancient Ur escaped their harrying as well as their own apostates who had embraced Yahweh and migrated all over. Some of them brought, agriculture, architecture etc (i.e. civilization) to the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Some Aryans followed them, conquering them during the Shukla Yajur Veda Period (invention of Archery, Chariot use in warfare). During the Krishna Yajur Veda Period, they settled under the treaty and laws of Bharatha. They exacted tribute from the Dasyus (Druids) in terms of agricultural and archtiectural produce and other forms of labour. This led to the decadence of the Sama Veda period. This led to the Kurukshetra War. This civil war broke Aryan hegemony giving rise to the Atharva Veda Period when the Dasyus and the Aryas inter married, the Shudra Varna entered the Guru Kulas and a great number of Aryas migrated back to their home lands and beyond. The Atharva Veda (Vedic period) came to an end when Ashoka destroyed the Druido-Aryan temples and dismantled the Gurukulas (thereby putting an end to Varna Mobility) in revenge for being declared an outcaste by the Supreme Council of Kashi when he contravened the treaty of Bharatha that established the consensus of Ashwamedha Yajna during the Krishna Yajur Veda period in place of the Rik Vedic Rajasooya where the heads of opposing kings are offered in the sacred fire by the victor. Ashoka waged war on his fellow Aryas (like the US waging war on NATO). Markers, there is no older structure than Saranath in Ashoka's former empire. The back lash to Ashoka's tyranny destroyed Budhism is India together withn the Ashoka Chakra with which Ashoka replaced the Swastika of Aryavartha Dharma whereas, Budhism prospers in South East Asia and Japan with the Swastika emblazoned on Budhist temples. Adi Shankara whose ancestors fled deep South to escape Ashokan persecution revived Sanskrit and the Brahma Sutras. At this time too a great number of Druido Aryas migrated to the North and the North West from India.